Skip to main content

Broadcast Groups

Status: Experimental
Version: Added in 2026.1.9

Overview

Broadcast Groups enable multiple agents to process and respond to the same message simultaneously. This allows you to create specialized agent teams that work together in a single WhatsApp group or DM — all using one phone number. Current scope: WhatsApp only (web channel). Broadcast groups are evaluated after channel allowlists and group activation rules. In WhatsApp groups, this means broadcasts happen when OpenClaw would normally reply (for example: on mention, depending on your group settings).

Use Cases

1. Specialized Agent Teams

Deploy multiple agents with atomic, focused responsibilities:
Each agent processes the same message and provides its specialized perspective.

2. Multi-Language Support

3. Quality Assurance Workflows

4. Task Automation

Configuration

Basic Setup

Add a top-level broadcast section (next to bindings). Keys are WhatsApp peer ids:
  • group chats: group JID (e.g. [email protected])
  • DMs: E.164 phone number (e.g. +15551234567)
Result: When OpenClaw would reply in this chat, it will run all three agents.

Processing Strategy

Control how agents process messages:

Parallel (Default)

All agents process simultaneously:

Sequential

Agents process in order (one waits for previous to finish):

Complete Example

How It Works

Message Flow

  1. Incoming message arrives in a WhatsApp group
  2. Broadcast check: System checks if peer ID is in broadcast
  3. If in broadcast list:
    • All listed agents process the message
    • Each agent has its own session key and isolated context
    • Agents process in parallel (default) or sequentially
  4. If not in broadcast list:
    • Normal routing applies (first matching binding)
Note: broadcast groups do not bypass channel allowlists or group activation rules (mentions/commands/etc). They only change which agents run when a message is eligible for processing.

Session Isolation

Each agent in a broadcast group maintains completely separate:
  • Session keys (agent:alfred:whatsapp:group:120363... vs agent:baerbel:whatsapp:group:120363...)
  • Conversation history (agent doesn’t see other agents’ messages)
  • Workspace (separate sandboxes if configured)
  • Tool access (different allow/deny lists)
  • Memory/context (separate IDENTITY.md, SOUL.md, etc.)
  • Group context buffer (recent group messages used for context) is shared per peer, so all broadcast agents see the same context when triggered
This allows each agent to have:
  • Different personalities
  • Different tool access (e.g., read-only vs. read-write)
  • Different models (e.g., opus vs. sonnet)
  • Different skills installed

Example: Isolated Sessions

In group [email protected] with agents ["alfred", "baerbel"]: Alfred’s context:
Bärbel’s context:

Best Practices

1. Keep Agents Focused

Design each agent with a single, clear responsibility:
Good: Each agent has one job
Bad: One generic “dev-helper” agent

2. Use Descriptive Names

Make it clear what each agent does:

3. Configure Different Tool Access

Give agents only the tools they need:

4. Monitor Performance

With many agents, consider:
  • Using "strategy": "parallel" (default) for speed
  • Limiting broadcast groups to 5-10 agents
  • Using faster models for simpler agents

5. Handle Failures Gracefully

Agents fail independently. One agent’s error doesn’t block others:

Compatibility

Providers

Broadcast groups currently work with:
  • ✅ WhatsApp (implemented)
  • 🚧 Telegram (planned)
  • 🚧 Discord (planned)
  • 🚧 Slack (planned)

Routing

Broadcast groups work alongside existing routing:
  • GROUP_A: Only alfred responds (normal routing)
  • GROUP_B: agent1 AND agent2 respond (broadcast)
Precedence: broadcast takes priority over bindings.

Troubleshooting

Agents Not Responding

Check:
  1. Agent IDs exist in agents.list
  2. Peer ID format is correct (e.g., [email protected])
  3. Agents are not in deny lists
Debug:

Only One Agent Responding

Cause: Peer ID might be in bindings but not broadcast. Fix: Add to broadcast config or remove from bindings.

Performance Issues

If slow with many agents:
  • Reduce number of agents per group
  • Use lighter models (sonnet instead of opus)
  • Check sandbox startup time

Examples

Example 1: Code Review Team

User sends: Code snippet
Responses:
  • code-formatter: “Fixed indentation and added type hints”
  • security-scanner: “⚠️ SQL injection vulnerability in line 12”
  • test-coverage: “Coverage is 45%, missing tests for error cases”
  • docs-checker: “Missing docstring for function process_data

Example 2: Multi-Language Support

API Reference

Config Schema

Fields

  • strategy (optional): How to process agents
    • "parallel" (default): All agents process simultaneously
    • "sequential": Agents process in array order
  • [peerId]: WhatsApp group JID, E.164 number, or other peer ID
    • Value: Array of agent IDs that should process messages

Limitations

  1. Max agents: No hard limit, but 10+ agents may be slow
  2. Shared context: Agents don’t see each other’s responses (by design)
  3. Message ordering: Parallel responses may arrive in any order
  4. Rate limits: All agents count toward WhatsApp rate limits

Future Enhancements

Planned features:
  • Shared context mode (agents see each other’s responses)
  • Agent coordination (agents can signal each other)
  • Dynamic agent selection (choose agents based on message content)
  • Agent priorities (some agents respond before others)

See Also